Hello,
My wife and I are coming to Chicago for 4 nights in early November. We would like to stay in River North, and I have narrowed hotels to the Royal Sonesta and the Residence Inn. Reviews are similarly favorable for both, and rates are also very close. Is there a substantive difference between the two? Is one more luxurious? Too far from Mich Ave? Does anyone have a preference? Many thx.
Both the Royal Sonesta and the Residence Inn in River North are solid choices, and since your trip is only four nights, your decision will likely come down to your priorities in style, amenities, and location rather than major differences in quality.
Luxury and Style: The Royal Sonesta is generally considered slightly more upscale and stylish, with a more boutique hotel feel. It has a modern, sleek design and typically offers more traditional hotel amenities such as a full-service restaurant, bar, and concierge services. It’s a good choice if you want a polished, hotel-like experience.
The Residence Inn, on the other hand, is an extended-stay brand, so rooms are often larger with kitchenettes. It’s more practical and comfortable for longer stays or if you want to prepare some of your own meals. The atmosphere is less luxurious and more homey, but still clean, well-reviewed, and convenient.
Location: Both hotels are in River North, which is very walkable and close to downtown. Here’s a comparison regarding Michigan Avenue:
Amenities: Consider what matters most for your stay:
Both hotels are well-situated for exploring River North, the Loop, and nearby attractions. For a shorter trip focused on restaurants, theater, and shopping, the Royal Sonesta leans slightly more luxurious. If you value more space and in-room kitchen facilities, the Residence Inn is convenient without sacrificing location.
Overall recommendation:
In either case, you’ll be close enough to Michigan Avenue to walk comfortably, and both hotels provide a safe, convenient base for exploring River North and downtown Chicago.